Funnel theory of dating
Neoreaction is a political ideology supporting a return to traditional ideas of government and society, especially traditional monarchy and an ethno-nationalist state.
What evidence have the Reactionaries cite for their side?Both “Reaction” and “Progressivism” are vast umbrella concepts on whose definition no one can agree.Both combine many very diverse ideas, and sometimes exactly who falls on what side will be exactly the point at issue.If the Reactionaries can muster some data saying that something has been getting better up until 2005 but declining from 2005 to the present, that doesn’t cut it.If something else was worsening from 1950 to 1980 but has been improving since then, that doesn’t cut it either.Progressivism is supposed to be a worldwide movement, stronger than the vagaries of local politics.
I will not require complete concordance between all Western countries, but if the Anglosphere countries, France, Germany, and Japan seem split about fifty-fifty between growth and decay in a certain indicator, blaming Progressivism isn’t going to cut it.
Part 2 of this FAQ mostly draws from Michael’s feudal perspective and Part 4 is entirely based on Moldbug’s corporation-based ideas.
0.3: Are you going to treat Reaction and Progressivism as real things? One of the problems in exercises like this is how much to take political labels seriously.
Although debating the meaning of category words is almost never productive, I feel like in that case I have more than enough excuse.
It is a staple of Reactionary thought that everything is getting gradually worse.
[Edit 3/2014: I no longer endorse all the statements in this document.